Arya News - How the nation’s highest could rules could have major implications in this year’s midterm elections.
The administration of United States President Donald Trump has made another appeal to the Supreme Court to allow new restrictions on mail-in voting ahead of the midterms in November.
Two days after a federal judge blocked the US Postal Service (USPS) from enforcing Trump’s executive order, the administration on Sunday escalated the matter to the country’s highest court, asking justices to temporarily allow the agency to track mail-in ballots and decide whether they could be rejected. The ongoing legal battle comes even as some states have already begun sending out postal ballots.
Recommended Stories
list of 3 items list 1 of 3 US judge repeats block on Trump’s bid to limit voting by mail list 2 of 3 Top US general says no plans to deploy troops for 2026 midterm elections list 3 of 3 What’s behind the vote-by-mail controversy in the US? end of list US District Judge Indira Talwani issued an order on Friday that said Trump’s directives, which would grant the federal government power over the handling of mail-in ballots, are likely unconstitutional. In the US, elections – including ones for federal office – are carried out by states.
The judge also criticised the timing of the executive order’s implementation, writing that, with just two months until election day, it “threatens disenfranchisement of millions of United States citizens who seek to vote by mail”.
But in its emergency filing on Sunday, the Trump administration countered Talwani’s ruling: “Contrary to the claims of the district court and respondents that the Postal Service is trying to federalise the rules for mail-in voting, the Postal Service’s final rule imposes only modest envelope-design and addressee-information requirements for federal-election ballots sent via U.S. Mail”.
US Solicitor General John Sauer, who argues cases before the Supreme Court on behalf of the federal government, said Trump’s order would not seize control of states’ right to administer elections, but would only impose “reasonable preparation requirements” for mail-in ballots.
“[The rule] requires States to upload the name, address and barcode information of intended recipients of ballot mail in an online portal — information that election officials would necessarily already possess to send ballot mail under the Rule to those recipients,” Sauer wrote in the filing. “The Rule ensures that States remain responsible for determining voter eligibility and eligibility to vote by mail, and it does not dictate ballot content, mailing or receipt deadlines, or ballot-counting procedures.”
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson set a deadline of Wednesday for responses to the Trump administration’s request.
Sunday’s filing marks the third time the Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to intervene. The court recently allowed the plan to move forward but did not rule on whether it was legal.
With control of the US Congress up for grabs in November, how the Supreme Court rules on the appeal could have major implications.
Despite voting by mail himself, Trump has long sought to limit it during his time in office, ly claiming that it is ripe with fraud. Opponents say the president’s motivation is simpler, arguing that Democrats vote by mail more than Republicans.
An analysis conducted by the States United Democracy Center found that many voters, no matter their political affiliation, cast their ballots by mail. The research found that one in four registered Democrats and one in five registered Republicans voted by mail in the 2024 presidential election.